
(Tuesday 31 March 2009)
Ditch the stupidity
I WENT to see the Age Of Stupid climate change documentary at Glasgow Film Theatre last week. As a movie, it's better than Al Gore's award-winning Powerpoint presentation An Inconvenient Truth, but it is really as a piece of propaganda that Age Of Stupid works.
I wasn't taken with many of the real-life characters whose stories make up the narrative elements of the film, like Piers, the credulous and somewhat posh organic Devon farmer who has turned wind farm entrepreneur only to be foiled by a Nimby campaign.
But I keep thinking about the basic facts which are clear throughout the movie.
In Europe, the average carbon footprint - the amount of greenhouse gas we are each responsible for creating - is about 10 tons per year. In the US it is nearly twice that.
But unless the average for the whole world is reduced to just one ton each per year within the next couple of decades, we run the risk of climate catastrophe.
This week, I've been calculating my carbon footprint after seeing Age Of Stupid, to find that I generate between seven and eight tons per year.
I'm glad that it worked out less than the average - I only made one short-haul return flight in the last year - I don't drive much, I walk to work and the kids walk to school, we don't eat much red meat and we recycle lots of things - but our household still generates seven or eight times as much greenhouse gas than we should. And as a society, as a species, we are still in the age of stupid.
We really do need to take action. Just cutting down on flights and eating less red meat isn't going to cut it.
It will take a massive sustained change in the way we exploit and share the world's resources.
The Copenhagen summit in December needs to establish stringent targets and then these have to be met, unlike Kyoto or Rio.
And to do that, we need to challenge big oil, and big capital. We can't do that as individuals in a free market - it really will take mass political action for democratic ownership and control of the commanding heights of the world economy.
The G20 demo in London was about combining the themes of jobs, justice and climate change. If enough of us are not stupid then we can perhaps be optimistic as well as worried.
Low pay and equal pay in Glasgow
GLASGOW Council leader Steven Purcell announced a living wage of £7 an hour for his city at the Labour Conference in Dundee just a couple of weeks ago.
The idea seemed so good to party leader Iain Gray that he nicked it as a Labour campaign for NHS workers in Scotland last week. Well and good.
The living wage is not a new idea, of course, having been established in London under mayor Ken Livingstone.
Anti-poverty campaigners in Scotland including the Poverty Alliance and trade unions have been developing the idea in Scotland for some time.
Though Purcell could be uncharitably viewed as trying to get his name associated with the idea first, his initiative is worthy of support - as long as the city council really does get suppliers, not to mention all of its own "arm's length" companies, such as Culture and Sport Glasgow, to follow suit and pay a living wage.
Seven pounds is little enough for an hour's work and, as a society, we can and should pay people enough to have a decent life.
The shine of the living wage idea would reflect more brightly on Councillor Purcell if Glasgow City Council would settle its outstanding equal pay claims.
This would not only improve the lot of hundreds of women workers but would be a massive step towards ending the disgrace of discriminatory pay that councils around Scotland have been responsible for.
Glasgow and councils across Scotland have been spending a fortune on lawyers in tribunals where tens of thousands of equal pay claims are being contested.
Last week, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) Scotland decided to launch an investigation into whether Glasgow City Council's pay and grading arrangements provide equal pay for classroom assistants.
If not, the council will have been acting unlawfully.
This is the first time the EHRC Scotland has used its investigatory powers. The step was welcomed by UNISON and the GMB which organise the predominantly female workers involved.
UNISON's Glasgow branch convener Mike Kirby said: "Classroom assistants are a hidden army of talented and dedicated workers whose value is often overlooked. We trust the investigation will help us to deliver the wages they deserve."
And GMB Scotland officer Alex McLuckie said: "Glasgow should now do the sensible thing by paying what they owe their women employees."
Land for the people - Knoydart celebrates
LAST week the 100 people of Knoydart on the west coast of Scotland began celebrations of the 10th anniversary of their community land buyout.
It was literally a landmark event in highland history.
For centuries, private landlords have run the highland estates, to the great cost and often exile of the people.
Through the 19th and early 20th centuries, the crofting and land reform movements were accompanied by daring land raids - direct action, occupations and work-ins no less heroic and important than any factory strike.
The last land raid in Scotland was by the "seven men of Knoydart" in 1948, who claimed their land from notorious absentee owner Lord Brocket.
The courts ruled against them and sadly the then Labour government failed to back them.
Half a century later, the 1997 Labour government and then the Scottish Parliament at last put in place legislation and a funding framework which allowed community land buyouts.
The Knoydart Foundation was set up in 1997, put together a partnership and funding with the aid of Highland Council, the John Muir Trust and others and bought the 17,000-acre estate in March 1999 for £750,000.
The land is now owned by its people and the venture so far is a great success, with new houses, a forest trust, a renovated hydro-electric system, more tourism and, crucially, more people - including children.
Perhaps the best aspect of the Knoydart buyout is that it is not unique.
Indeed, the list of community land buyouts now tops 100 and includes Assynt in 1993, Borve and Anishader, Skye, in 1993, Eigg in 1997, Knoydart in 1999, Gigha in 2002, North Harris in 2003, Assynt Foundation in 2005, Seaforth Estate, Harris, in 2005, Galson, Lewis, in 2006 and South Uist Estates in 2006.
It is never easy to take democratic control of the land, but it is possible.
Dundee workers do it their way
AT the beginning of March, the 12 employees of Dundee packaging company Prisme were told that the business was bust and they were out of a job. There wasn't even any money for redundancy.
They occupied the factory and then decided to try and take over the business and run it as a co-operative.
Three weeks later, it looks as though they may have a chance of succeeding.
The workers have been assisted by Dundee North law centre in taking action to secure their redundancy money which is still outstanding.
But as the workers took action, they became convinced they could run the business themselves.
The new co-operative venture, called Discovery Packaging and Design, has won support from the city's Business Gateway. The workers have secured promises to keep equipment formerly leased to Prisme and have worked out a business plan which would save at least some of the jobs, despite the loss of some customers after Prisme went bust.
"Prisme treated us like second-class citizens and wanted to wash their hands of us," David Taylor told the Big Issue in Scotland magazine during the sit-in.
"We were not prepared to accept this. We're not militant people - just little people who refused to be little anymore. We stood up for what we believe in and we are all proud of that."