
(Tuesday 26 May 2009)
Can new Labour restore lost credit with radical democratic reforms?
The MP expenses scandal has provided endless hours of morally justified fun as well as outrage for all of us plebs, who would never ever fiddle a claim of course.
Duck houses and moats encapsulate Tory greed, and we happily jeer because it doesn't surprise us.
But the most shocking thing is that neither does the greed of Labour MPs.
Yes, we know from the last 12 years that there are far too few honourable men and women on the Labour benches. But you'd imagine that every Labour MP would be extremely careful to keep their noses clean on expenses. After all, they owe their very seats in large part to public revulsion at Tory sleaze of the 1980s and 1990s.
Meanwhile, the moral panic kicked off by the scandal has extended to the very constitution of the UK itself.
It is good that people in power are for once talking seriously about a list of issues including the balance of powers between parliament and government, the status of the House of Lords and the electoral system.
But the danger is that it will be the powerful already in the Establishment who will decide what changes get made and that such changes will not fulfil the demands for openness, transparency or democracy.
I can see the twisted smile of m'Lord Mandelson as he readies his latest scam to separate the trade unions he despises from the Labour Party with his scheme for state funding of political parties.
If there's going to be constitutional change, it needs to come from the bottom up, not from the rotten top down.
The people of Britain could learn a useful lesson from us Scots. We went through a lot of constitutional debate before the Scottish Parliament was finally established in the 1990s.
The fact that our Holyrood Parliament commands respect now is because it was founded on a Claim of Right - the sovereignty of the Scottish people.
It was given form by the Scottish Constitutional Convention, led by the civic bodies of Scotland - the Scottish TUC and the local authorities and the churches.
And it was delivered in 1997 by the popular vote for the Labour Party, which had made devolution its main platform in the election in Scotland.
So let's have a UK Constitutional Convention - with the people represented by their unions and civic bodies, not just the Westminster parties and their vested interests. Let's have everything on the agenda for open debate, not conjured up by dark forces behind the scenes.
The Labour Party could rescue some of its lost credit by proposing radical democratic reforms and pledging to implement them if elected.
Sadly, the current Labour leadership is far more likely to worm its way out of the trouble its venality and corruption has landed it in. If that happens, history and the people will not forgive - or re-elect - them.
Kirk facing schism over the calling of Rev Rennie
The Westminster Parliament isn't the only institution facing its biggest disruption in centuries.
The Church of Scotland is riven from genesis to revelation by the "call" which the congregation of Queen's Cross church in Aberdeen made to openly gay minister Rev Scott Rennie.
In fact Rev Rennie has been a Church of Scotland minister in Brechin for 10 years.
He is a popular and active local community activist. He was married and has a child but has been openly in a gay relationship for some time.
Kirk homophobes seized their opportunity to campaign and formal complaints were raised by members from other congregations against the appointment.
So the church's supreme court had to decide.
On Friday last week, the church commissioners voted 326 to 267 to confirm Rev Rennie's appointment.
Now, some of the homophobes have said that they will split from the church, which faced its last major division over the issue of its independence from the British parliament in 1843.
Sunday to Stornoway's a no-brainer
About a month ago, I wrote to the directors of Caledonian MacBrayne, the state-owned ferry company that provides services to the Western Isles, to ask why they couldn't run ferries on Sundays.
I'd been home to Lewis for the school holidays with my partner and two youngest children, wanting to spend a full week there. So it was a bit of a pain not to be able to travel on Sunday at either end of the week, cropping our holiday from seven days to five.
The reply I got from CalMac was a bit like one from Prime Minister's Questions. The company said it was "...sympathetic to both bodies of opinion... blah blah... complex situation..." and would not make a decision until it assessed how the current Road Equivalent Tariff trials work out over the next couple of years.
But the truth is that the company has always been too scared of the minority of Presbyterian zealots that dominate life in the northern part of the Western Isles.
So you can imagine the surprise and delight among campaigners for Sunday ferries when a week or so ago CalMac announced that Sunday ferries were not only needed but would be scheduled imminently.
This was because the Equality and Human Rights Commission had ruled on a submission made to them that to deny travellers the right to Sunday ferries on the basis of the religious views of others would be in contravention of the Equality Act 2006.
This would be a boost for island businesses and tourism as well as for the diaspora like me. God, if he or she existed, would know that the people of the Western Isles need it - the local economy is so weak that there are 44 applicants for every job vacancy and it is the only part of the UK that is actually suffering depopulation.
Hopefully, it should also spell the end for the hold which the bigots have over the local council, which closes its sports centre in Stornoway on Sundays, while allowing a similar facility in the predominantly Catholic islands to the south to open every day.