Could Labour's future rest on the devolution commission? MALCOLM BURNS reports.
THIS Friday is the deadline for responses to the second round of consultation by the Calman Commission on Scottish devolution.
The nine broad questions of the initial consultation last summer have multiplied into a veritable catechism of 49 questions in Calman's interim report published in December.
You'll get the flavour from the first four, which deal with "principles":
Q1. Should any changes in devolution presume a continued common UK legal and political citizenship?
Q2. Are the UK's constitutional arrangements sufficiently flexible to allow devolved interests to be taken properly into account when they impact on reserved matters?
Q3. Is the commission right in concluding that, when changes in powers or finance are considered which might allow the Scottish Parliament to serve the people of Scotland better, they should not run the risk of significantly undermining the economic aspect of the Union?
Q4. Should there be scope for much greater differences in social provision and in consequence greater reliance on Scottish tax resources? Alternatively, should devolution be in the context of a common social citizenship across the UK and, if so, should the elements of that citizenship be articulated in some way?
See what I mean about catechism? But these are not simplistic rote questions of faith with prescribed answers. Try answering them yourself.
Calman's remit obviously precluded consideration of independence, but the commission has been grappling seriously with the complex issues before it and in this it compares favourably with the still vacuous "national conversation" of the SNP government.
A wide range of organisations and individuals have engaged with the commission and Calman has been commendably open in publishing evidence at www.commissiononscottishdevolution.org.uk already. I hope to see the next round of submissions online shortly.
The responses of the main opposition parties to Calman's interim report will be especially interesting to read. These will effectively frame the political scope of the debate on enhanced powers for the Scottish Parliament within which Calman's conclusions will be finally published later this year.
There's lots of scope for the politicians to get their knickers in a twist. Labour in particular needs to deliver an inspiring response to Calman so that, in turn, Calman's final report will go far beyond the status quo in terms of the powers and funding of the Holyrood Parliament and its relationship with Westminster.
It is well known that a significant number of the Scottish Labour MPs have little love for the devolved parliament. Ironically enough, it is the Westminster government which will have to deliver on Calman - and the stakes are high.
If Labour heads into the British general election next year wearing its Union Jack underpants outside its trousers having stymied any radical recommendations from Calman, it can only expect a drubbing from a disappointed Scottish electorate.
This would virtually guarantee an already likely Tory victory, leaving a Cameron government to deliver whatever was left of the Calman consensus and Alex Salmond waiting in the wings for a referendum opportunity to capitalise on what he might reasonably expect will be increasing Scottish disaffection with the Union.
Scotland's slump just getting worse
LAST week, Labour's Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy announced that Jobcentres in Scotland would be taking on hundreds of new staff over the next 18 months to help newly unemployed Scots.
This reverses the programme of closures of Jobcentres and indicates that a deep recession is being planned for.
The Scottish unemployment and GDP figures show why.
Latest figures reveal that unemployment in Scotland rose by 11,000 in the three months to December, to reach 137,000 in total. The UK figure was just short of 2 million.
Scottish GDP, which had fallen by 0.8 per cent in the third quarter of 2008, will almost certainly have fallen even further in the last quarter of the year.
Closures and job loss announcements continue to pile up.
There's a lot of talk about whether this will be the worst recession, depression or slump in history. If it's anything like as bad the Thatcher recession of the early 1980s, it's going to be disastrous.
When I left school in 1976 I was 16 and there were a million unemployed in Britain. I took the opportunity of going to university the following year precisely because there were no jobs, reasoning that the recession would be over by the time I left uni, I'd have a degree and it would be easier to find work.
By the time I'd graduated, Thatcher had just about quadrupled unemployment and there were no jobs at all. Grim times.
The Tory strategy was actually designed to destroy jobs and job security as part of the attack on labour and particularly trade union strength.
Millions of people's lives were turned upside down by that cruel attack. Many hundreds of thousands never recovered. And our society is still suffering through the deliberate policies of privatisation, inequality and insecurity created by Thatcher.
Many of these, under the guise of a flexible, globalised labour market, were adopted by Tony Blair and are still being perpetrated by Gordon Brown.
We need a proper alternative to the dogmatic right-wing orthodoxies which both Tories and new Labour have espoused and which have so clearly failed. And the worse the recession, the more we will need it.
Left brains trust sets out to solve our woes
THE economic news in Scotland is as grim as everywhere else but problems, especially crises of capitalism, always present opportunities.
An opportunity to unite the Scottish left clearly exists in the current situation. This weekend, there are two chances to be part of that movement.
The first, promoted by the newly formed Scottish Labour Representation Committee, will take place on Saturday at Glasgow Caledonian University. It will be chaired by Kevin Lindsay of rail union ASLEF and speakers will include John McDonnell MP, Rozanne Foyer of Unite T&G and Vince Mills of the Scottish Labour Campaign for Socialism.
The Scottish LRC aims to bring together socialists on the Labour and non-Labour left, including within trade unions. The meeting will launch a six-point Scottish People's Charter demanding a fair economy for a fairer society, more and better jobs, decent homes for all, retained and improved public services, fairness and justice and a secure, sustainable future for all.
The charter's provisions will include ownership and control of the main banks - a once controversial idea now largely accepted by virtually everyone but the British government - the creation of 250,000 new publicly owned homes over the next five years, public ownership of public services and utilities, a halt to war and no Trident replacement, investment in green technology and debt cancellation for the world's poor.
This effectively forms an already widely supported left-wing agenda around which a broad-based campaign for a better future could be built.
And, on Sunday, there is a Morning Star conference at the Scottish TUC Centre in Glasgow around the theme The Economic Crisis: Who's to fix it?
Speakers will include Katy Clark MP, Professor Prem Sikka, STUC economist Stephen Boyd, Jackson Cullinane of Unite, SNP MSP John Wilson, Richard Leonard of GMB, the Scottish Socialist Party's Colin Fox and Simon Steel of the Communist Party of Britain. STUC general council member Liz Elkind will be in the chair.
If that weekend double whammy of a brains trust can't deliver a left alternative to the crisis, what could?